California becomes the first US state in banning the capture of animal fur and circus animal forever

California was the first state to ban the sale and production of new fur products, and the third to ban most animals from circus shows under several bills signed by Governor Gavin News in October 2019. The Fur Act has prohibited residents from selling or producing clothing, footwear, or fur bags since 2023.

Animal rights groups have welcomed this measure as protection against inhumane practices. The U.S. fur industry has strongly opposed this proposal, and the U.S. Fur Information Council has already threatened prosecution. This follows the signing of the News Act, which makes California the first state to ban fishing and selling fur in Los Angeles and San Francisco.

“California is a leader in animal protection, and today that leadership includes a ban on the use of fur,” he told Newsom in a press release. “But we do a lot more. We tell the world that beautiful wild animals like bears and tigers have no place on trapezoidal wires or in the fire. ”

This bill, which was adopted for 30-9 years in the Senate and for 51-19 years in Congress, is one of the two skin laws presented at this session. The second bill (AB 44) prohibits the manufacture and sale of new leather goods in California if passed.

According to reports of fishing license sales, only 133 fishing licenses were sold in California in 2017. Together with four licenses from four dealers, this brought the State Department of Fisheries and Wildlife just over $16,000. This year alone, 1,568 animals were killed, and 1,241 hides sold, totaling less than $9,000. One of the legislators’ arguments was that the industry is too small and too expensive to regulate.

San Diego Democrat and Californian Congressman Lorena Gonzalez drafted a bill that was supported by animal welfare organizations, including the Center for Biodiversity and Social Compassion in Legislation. “Not only does the cruel fur trade destroy our increasingly vulnerable wildlife population, but the program even makes no sense in terms of tax policy,” she said in a statement.

The movement has been praised by animal rights activists such as Fleur Dawes of Animal Welfare: “We are very grateful to Governor Newsom and Congressman Gonzalez for protecting coyotes, minks, foxes, beavers, raccoons, badgers and all animals in California from barbaric traps,” he said.

It’s a victory for the animals and for all Californians, who have worked in the thousands to protect animals from the extreme cruelty of fur traps. California sends a clear message to the world that fur-bearing animals have the right to live in their fur, to be free, mutilated, and killed by disgusting traps to steal their fur for the banal “fashion” demands. – he added.

Margo Paine, center, joins protesters with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) in Los Angeles on September 18, 2018.
Margo Paine, center, joins protesters with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) in Los Angeles on September 18, 2018.

The ban on fur does not apply to products that are already used or used for religious or tribal purposes. It also does not apply to the sale of hides and skins of dogs and cats, cattle, deer, sheep, and goats or anything stored for cooking purposes.

This measure could be a serious blow to the fur industry, which produces products of animal origin such as mink, chinchillas, rabbits and other animals. The turnover of the American fur industry last year was 1.5 billion dollars.

Fashion houses such as Versace, Gucci, and Armani have promised to stop using fur. Under California law, repeated violations can result in fines of up to $1,000. Animal protection groups have concluded that animals can be exposed to the gas, electroshock, and other inhumane activities to obtain their furs.

The Direct Action Everywhere activist group said it is working with activists to pass similar laws in U.S. cities, including Minneapolis and Portland, Oregon, and is optimistic that California laws will encourage action. “Ordinary people want animals to be protected, not abused,” said Cassie King, a group organizer from Berkeley.

However, opponents of the law said the decision could create a black market and a slippery slope to ban other products. “The ban is part of a radical vegetarian program that uses fur as a first step to further ban what we wear and eat,” Fur Information Council spokeswoman Keith Kaplan said in a press release. He also said synthetic leather is not a renewable or sustainable option.

The ban is part of a “radical vegan program that uses fur as a first step to further ban what we wear and eat,” Fur Information Council spokesman Keith Kaplan said in a previous statement. He also said synthetic leather is not a renewable or sustainable option.

Meanwhile, California, along with New Jersey and Hawaii, prohibits most animals from circus performances.

The law excludes dogs, cats, and pets and does not apply to rodeos.

For decades, the popularity of the circus has been declining. The most famous actress is Ringling Bros. and Barnum & amp; Bailey Circus closed in 2017 after 146 years of performances.

According to government officials, at least two live circuses are expected in California this year. At least 18 circuses do not use animals, including the Cirque du Soleil.

Critics initially warned that the proposal was too broad and would affect district exhibitions and wildlife conservation and restoration organizations. In response, the legislator narrowed the definition of a circus to ‘live performances where the main attraction or activity is entertainment composed of various artists such as acrobats, trapeze, clowns, jugglers or acrobats.’ ”

The law provides for fines of up to $25,000 per day for each violation.

Democrat senator Ben Huéso, the author of the bill, argued that wild animals in circuses were brutally trained and almost permanently imprisoned.

“We can’t have this kind of abuse in California,” Bone said, according to the legal analysis of the bill, which was eventually passed.

The Legislative Council of southwestern California rejected the bill and said it would prevent people from “experiencing the excitement of circus performances with beautiful, well-groomed animals.

Newsom also signed a bill to protect horses from Saturday’s murder. The law requires operators of public and private auction parks to put up new signs, declare their will under oath, and publish identification information on the Internet from January 1, 2020.

It is necessary to take care that the California population of horses is not sent to the slaughter illegally. – said San Diego Democrat Congressman Todd Gloria, author of Todd Gloria.

Sources:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/13/fur-ban-california-outlaws-making-and-selling-new-products

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50030291

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/13/us/california-bans-fur-products-trnd/index.html

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/fashion/california-fur-ban-clothing-sell-circus-animals-a9154156.html

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/california-fur-ban_n_5da2156be4b02c9da04b47bc